a process composed of a series of psychological transformations by which an individual acquires, codes, stores, recalls, and decodes information
about the relative locations and attributes of phenomena in their everyday spatial environment.
Source: Downs RM, Stea D. Cognitive Maps and Spatial Behavior: Process and Products.
In Downs RM, Stea D. (Eds.) Image and Environment, Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago (1973:8-26)
In more general terms, a cognitive map may be defined as "an overall mental image or representation of the space and layout of a setting", which means that the act of cognitive mapping is "the mental
structuring process leading to the creation of a cognitive map".
Cognitive map is the term used to refer to one's internal representation of the experienced world. Cognitive mapping includes the various processes used to sense, encode, store,
decode, and use this information. Cognitive maps are invariably incomplete and partially distorted, features that can be revealed in external representations or in spatial
Edward Tolman (1947)1 inferred the existence of cognitive maps by recording the spatial behavior of a maze-running rat who took a "short cut" to the final destination by running
across the top of a maze instead of following a route through it.
Recognition of this "place learning" activity stimulated multidisciplinary research in spatial knowledge acquisition.
In city planning, Kevin Lynch2 used sketch maps to reveal human knowledge of large-scale complex environments.
Geographers researched the nature of "mental maps" via revealed place preference, subjective distance and configurational (layout) representation using non-metric multidimensional scaling
(MDS) and layout matching (spatial congruence) techniques.
The methods used to assess spatial knowledge and examine how it is created have multiplied as researchers from anthropology, psychology, disability studies, artificial intelligence,
computer science, and geography have explored assessment methods including pointing (for direction and orientation), interpoint distance examination (for spatial structure and layout
and geometry), landmark learning, location/place hierarchies based on anchor point concepts, path integration (short-cutting and spatial updating), piloting (landmark navigation),
chunking (route learning), "look-back strategies" (place fixing), verbalizing acquired knowledge (spatial linguistics) and other methods that use repeated behaviors to reveal and
assess the spatial information contained in long-term memory (i.e. in cognitive maps).
Tolman EC. Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men
The Psychological Review 1948;55(4):189-208.
Retrieved from Classics in the History of Psychology, An internet resource developed by Christopher D. Green
York University, Toronto, Ontario. fn. Tolman's work was first delivered in presentations at the University of California, Berkeley (17.03.47) and Western Reserve University, Cleveland (26.03.47)
Lynch K. The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press (1960)
[...] A central notion in this book is that of legibility (also called
imageability and visibility). Legibility means the extend to
which the cityscape can be 'read'. People who move through the city engage in
way-finding. They need to be able to recognize and organize urban elements into
a coherent pattern. "In the process of way-finding, the strategic link is the
environmental image, the generalized mental picture of the exterior physical
world that is held by an individual. This image is the product both of immediate
sensation and of the memory of past experience, and it is used to interpret
information and to guide action" (p.4). Lynch proposes that these mental maps
consist of five elements: (1) paths: routes along which people move
throughout the city; (2) edges: boundaries and breaks in continuity;
(3) districts: areas characterized by common characteristics; (4)
nodes: strategic focus points for orientation like squares and
junctions; and (5) landmarks: external points of orientation, usually a[n]
easily identif[i]able physical object in the urban landscape. Of these five
elements, paths are especially important according Lynch, since these organize
urban mobility. [...]
The brain encodes two distinct maps of the route from one location to another and switches between the two at different phases of the journey, according to new research presented earlier this
week at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in Washington, D.C.
We know that a brain structure called the hippocampus, in the medial temporal lobe, is essential for spatial navigation and for encoding spatial memories. It contains at least
four different cell types that encode maps of the environment, but exactly
how this occurs is unknown.
According to one model, the hippocampus encodes a Euclidean path, or straight line, between point A and point B. Another suggests that it encodes the true path between the two locations,
incorporating diversions around obstacles.
The results provide a new understand of how the brain's navigational system operates, showing what kind of spatial information is encoded by which brain regions and also when the information is used.
The hippocampus appears to be encoding two different maps of the path to a journey, with the anterior region tracking the Euclidean distance to the final destination and the posterior hippocampus
tracking the "true path" and homing in on the destination.
"According to previous models of spatial navigation, the hippocampus does one or the other," says Spiers. "We found it actually does both, and that it flips between the two in an elegant way.
There's no model in which it does both and certainly not one proposing that it flips between the two."
Cognitive mapping is a neuropsychological process, with both conscious and unconscious aspects. Cognitive maps can be generated with or without conscious intent, and they are not always self-intimating. "Although the cognitive map represents a set of processes of unknown physiological and controversial
psychological nature," write Downs and Stea (1980), "its effect and function are clear. We believe that a cognitive map exists if an individual behaves as if a cognitive map exists."
Most of human action is based on habits. They are not pondered but executed automatically, based on experience and knowledge about the (social) environment
and the individual's capacities. Knowledge about physical capacities, social resources and the ongoing relation with them is represented in cognitive maps and
schemas (see, e.g., Sandler & Rosenblatt, 1962; Lazarus & Folkman, 1984; Markus & Wurf, 1987; Baldwin, 1992). These cognitive maps contain knowledge like: how
fast can I move, I can count on the help of a friend if necessary, my husband will bring the children to school on Monday and Wednesday; an enormous amount of
information about the environment that is used in automatic day-to-day functioning. It is difficult to appreciate how pervasive the use of these maps is; since automatic
functioning is designed to liberate attention, most of its working is unconscious. But it is precisely when change occurs that these behavior patterns are being noticed.
Everybody who has temporarily lost the use of a hand has become suddenly aware of the hundreds of things that cannot be executed normally or automatically. Simple
actions, such as preparing or eating food, dressing or even sitting down, suddenly have to be monitored carefully for them to be carried out without accidents.
This example may also serve to illustrate that introducing changes in cognitive structures will take considerable time, since cognitive maps form an extensive network,
where the elements of the individual's environment and existing resources are included numerous times. If a resource disappears, all relevant acts and behaviors in which this
resource is present have to be updated. [...]
Sandler J, Rosenblatt B. (1962). The concept of the representational world. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child. 27:128–145.
Lazarus RS, Folkman S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
Markus H, Wurf E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology. 38:299–337.
Baldwin M W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin. 112:461–484.
Different Types of Cognitive Map and Mapping Techniques
Again, while cognitive maps can be created and modified by conscious intent, they also arise and operate without conscious intent, manifested in cognitive structures reflecting values,
emotions, behaviors, etc.
Cognitive mapping is an umbrella term encompassing, for example, causal, semantic, and concept mapping all of which
refer to types of mental model or schema and more precise typologic refinements are possible. Samsonovich and Ascoli (2007) examine conceptual value maps to represent a human value system with a cognitive
map beyond spatial and temporal dimensions. Different kinds of cognitive maps, they write, can be "distinguished on the basis of the semantics they represent (logic, values, feelings, qualia) and on
the representation systems they map (e.g., one may distinguish contextual and conceptual cognitive maps)".
Figure 1. Cognitive maps are abstract metric spaces that reflect semantics of associated symbolic
representations. Different kinds of cognitive maps may represent different aspects of semantics and/or map
different kinds of representations.
The following paper provides a simplified set of distinctions.
[...] 2. COGNITIVE MAPPING TECHNIQUES
People like using graphical structures to help make sense of information. In psychology, "cognitive map" is a term developed by Tolman (1948) to describe an individual's internal mental
representation of the concepts and relations among concepts. This internal mental representation is used to understand the environment and make decisions accordingly. Cognitive maps are
regarded as "internally represented schémas or mental models for particular problem-solving domains that are learned and encoded as a result of an individual's interaction with [th]eir environment"
(Swan, 1997 pp. 188). Therefore, cognitive maps provide a presentation for what is known and believed, and exhibit [th]e reasoning behind purposeful actions (Fiol & Huff, 1992).
In contrast, cognitive mapping techniques are used to identify subjective beliefs and to portray [th]ese beliefs externally (Fiol & Huff, 1992). The general approach is to extract subjective
statements from individuals, within a particular problem domain, about meaningful concepts and relations among these concepts, and [th]en to describe [th]ese concepts and relations in some kind
of graphical layout (Swan, 1997). The outcome of a cognitive mapping technique is usually referred to as a cognitive map [...]
2.1 Causal mapping
Causal mapping is one of the most commonly used cognitive mapping techniques in investigating the cognition of decision makers in organizations (Swan, 1997). Causal mapping is derived from
personal construct theory (Kelly, 1955). This theory posits that an individual's set of perspectives is a system of personal constructs and individuals use their
own personal constructs to understand and interpret events. In other words, an individual understands [th]e environment with salient concepts (constructs), which
can be expressed by ei[th]er simple single-polar phrases or contextually rich bipolar phrases. An example of single-polar phrase is "good reader", while an
example of bipolar phrase is "good computer skills - poor computer skills". As revealed by its name, a causal map represents a set of causal relationships
among constructs within a belief system. Through capturing the cause effect relationships, insights into the reasoning of a particular person are acquired. [...]
2.2 Semantic mapping
It must be pointed out that causal assertions are only part of an individual's total belief system. There are some
cognitive mapping techniques that can be used to identify other relations among concepts. Semantic mapping, also known as idea mapping, is used to explore an
idea without the constraints of a superimposed structure (Buzan, 1993). To make a semantic map, one starts at the center of the paper with the main idea, and
works outwards in all directions, producing a growing and organized structure composed of key words and key images. Around the main idea (a central word),
five to ten ideas (child words) that are related to the central word are drawn. Each of these "child" words then serves as a sub-central word for the next level
drawing (Buzan, 1993). In other words, a semantic map has one main or central concept with tree-like branches. [...]
2.3 Concept mapping
Another popular cognitive mapping technique is called concept mapping. David Ausubel (Ausubel, 1968) emphasized on the importance of prior knowledge in being able
to learn about new concepts. Drawing on this theory, Novak (1993) concludes that existing cognitive structures are critical for learning new concepts. A concept map
is a graphical representation where nodes represent concepts, and links represent the relationships between concepts. The links, with labels to represent the type
of relationship between concepts, can be one-way, two-way, or non-directional. The concepts and the links may be categorized, and the concept map may show temporal
or causal relationships between concepts. Concept mapping is useful in generating ideas, designing a complex structure, communicating complex ideas, aiding learning by
explicitly integrating new and old knowledge, as well as assessing understanding or diagnosing misunderstanding (Jonassen, Beissner, & Yacci, 1993). [...] [Read More]
Ausubel D. (1968) Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Buzan T. (1993) The Mind Map Book. London: BBC Books.
Fiol CM, & Huff AS. (1992) Maps for managers: where are we? where do we go from here? Journal of Management Studies 29(3):267-285.
Jonassen DH, Beissner K, & Yacci MA. (1993) Structural knowledge: Techniques for conveying, assessing, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kelly GA. (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton & Company Inc.
Novak JD. (1993) How do we learn our lesson? Taking students through the process. The Science Teacher 60(3):50-55.
Swan J. (1997) Using cognitive mapping in management research: Decisions about technical innovation. British Journal of Management 8(2):183-198.
Tolman E. (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review 55(4):189-208.
Definition of a Concept Map
A Concept map is a type of cognitive map, in this sense, which may be taken to represent
a structured process, focused on a topic or construct of interest, involving input from one or more participants, that produces an interpretable pictorial
view (concept map) of their ideas and concepts and how these are interrelated.
Basically, a concept map is a graphical representation of the structure of knowledge.
In the 1960s, Joseph D. Novak (1993) at Cornell University began to study the concept mapping technique. His work was based on the theories of David Ausubel (1968), who stressed the importance of prior knowledge in being able to learn about new concepts. Novak concluded that "Meaningful learning involves the assimilation of new concepts
and propositions into existing cognitive structures." A concept map is a graphical representation where nodes (points or vertices) represent concepts, and links (arcs or lines) represent the relationships between concepts. The concepts, and sometimes the links, are labeled on the concept map. The links between the concepts can be one-way,
two-way, or non-directional. The concepts and the links may be categorized, and the concept map may show temporal or causal relationships between concepts. A concept map is a graphical representation where nodes (points or vertices) represent concepts, and links (arcs or lines) represent the relationships between concepts. The concepts, and sometimes the links, are labeled on the concept map. The links between the concepts can be one-way, two-way, or non-directional. The concepts and the links may
be categorized, and the concept map may show temporal or causal relationships between concepts.
In a brief paper entitled Concept Mapping in Social Research (2010), Bharat Prasad Pokharel refers to concepts as "the abstract
terms we employ to explain or make sense of our experience"; he cites Dey's (1993: 275) definition of concept "a general idea which stands for a class of objects", and provides several examples.
Pokharel explores the sources and types of concepts, as well as problems associated with concept use, chiefly, the fact that as the level of abstraction increases and the concept is more removed from objectively verifiable fact,
interpretive differences also increase.
Still more challenging are concepts that are familiar but not well understood, such as leadership, motivation, personality, social class, and fiscal
policy. For example, personality has been defined in the research literature in more than 400 ways (Hoover, 1991: 21). Although this may seem extreme, writers are not
able to express the complexity of the determinants of personality and its attributes (e.g., authoritarianism, risk taking, locus of control, achievement orientation and
dogmatism) in a fashion that produces agreement (Saunders et al., 2003). The concepts described represent progressive levels of abstraction that is, the degree to
which the concept does or does not have objective referents. [...]
Factors of personality may also influence the construction and interpretation of concept maps, as does the context model under which one
operates at any point in time. In Effect of Concept Mapping on Myers-Briggs Personality Types (2006), John W. Pelley writes that "the process of constructing a
concept map is approached differently by each of the Myers-Briggs personality types because these types are characterized by different preferences for information processing".
Sensing types are most at ease with linear thinking that sees knowledge in the form of lists of facts and procedural rules (linear learners), whereas intuitive types are most at ease
with pattern thinking that sees knowledge as interconnected concepts (integrative learners). The need for certainty in the sensing type creates a significant barrier to both learning
and implementing concept mapping, while the need for big picture learning makes concept mapping a satisfying intellectual exercise for intuitive types. Because
concept mapping includes several orders of cognitive complexity, it is a tool that can be used to sensing types overcome the tendency to avoid the use of higher order thinking skills.
The result is better developed critical thinking and improved long-term memory. Concept mapping benefits each of the Myers-Briggs personality types by helping to develop the use of
their non-preferred mental functions.
Credit: Philip Topham Key Opinion Leaders for the Insomnia Scientific Research Community (Names Scrambled) - using Social Network Analysis identify top individuals demo2.lnxresearch.com, via Visual Think Map
Credit: Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; via WorldBlog - NBC News.
This unclassified document from the Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shows the U.S. military's plan for "Afghanistan Stability/COIN Dynamics – Security."
[...A]n attempt to visualize the strategy reveals how immensely complicated it is for U.S. forces to accomplish.
[Above] is the military's schematic, a map of the counter insurgency strategy, that shows what U.S. troops hope to accomplish in Afghanistan. The slide is undoubtedly overwhelming. For some military commanders, the slide
is genius, an attempt to show how all things in war – from media bias to ethnic/tribal rivalries – are interconnected and must be taken into consideration. It represents a new approach to war fighting, looking beyond simply
killing enemy fighters. It underscores what those fighting wars have long known, that everything matters. [...]
Concept maps are graphical tools for organizing and representing knowledge. They include
concepts, usually enclosed in circles or boxes of some type, and relationships between
concepts indicated by a connecting line linking two concepts. Words on the line, referred to
as linking words or linking phrases, specify the relationship between the two concepts. We
define concept as a perceived regularity in events or objects, or records of events or
objects, designated by a label. The label for most concepts is a word, although sometimes
we use symbols such as + or %, and sometimes more than one word is used. Propositions
are statements about some object or event in the universe, either naturally occurring or
constructed. Propositions contain two or more concepts connected using linking words or
phrases to form a meaningful statement. Sometimes these are called semantic units, or
units of meaning. Figure 1 shows an example of a concept map that describes the structure
of concept maps and illustrates the above characteristics.
Figure 1. A concept map showing the key features of concept maps. Concept maps tend to be read progressing from the top downward. Click to enlarge.
Another characteristic of concept maps is that the concepts are represented in a hierarchical
fashion with the most inclusive, most general concepts at the top of the map and the more
specific, less general concepts arranged hierarchically below. The hierarchical structure for
a particular domain of knowledge also depends on the context in which that knowledge is
being applied or considered. Therefore, it is best to construct concept maps with reference
to some particular question we seek to answer, which we have called a focus question. The
concept map may pertain to some situation or event that we are trying to understand
through the organization of knowledge in the form of a concept map, thus providing the
context for the concept map.
Another important characteristic of concept maps is the inclusion of cross-links. These are
relationships or links between concepts in different segments or domains of the concept
map. Cross-links help us see how a concept in one domain of knowledge represented on the
map is related to a concept in another domain shown on the map. In the creation of new
knowledge, cross-links often represent creative leaps on the part of the knowledge
producer. There are two features of concept maps that are important in the facilitation of
creative thinking: the hierarchical structure that is represented in a good map and the ability
to search for and characterize new cross-links.
A final feature that may be added to concept maps is specific examples of events or objects
that help to clarify the meaning of a given concept. Normally these are not included in
ovals or boxes, since they are specific events or objects and do not represent concepts. [...] [Read More]
The Medicine Wheel as a Concept Map
The framework described above is quite specific, yet concept maps can take many forms. In the following example, utilizing the Medicine Wheel, hierarchical structure depends upon
the context and perspective from which one approaches the map.
The Medicine Wheel is a model of all creation, both reality and metaphor, representing all aspects and all facets of life.1,5,6 Everyone
and everything has a place in the natural order of the universe. Each point on the circle represents a different yet equally valid perspective on reality.2 There is no uniform version
of the Medicine Wheel. The culture and religion of each of the approximately 350 tribal groups was community-based, and it is thought that the development of the individual was emphasized in the
context of a greater whole, supporting individual differences and avoiding conflict within the tribe.2
Image Credit: Medicine Wheel sunset photograph by Tom Melham. Stanford SOLAR Center (2008)
Medicine Wheels thus take many different forms, and it is not always clear what the unique meaning or specific use of them might have been. The Bighorn Medicine Wheel in Wyoming7 is a good case in point.
In 1974, an archaeoastronomer named Jack Eddy visited this Medicine Wheel and studied its alignments, that is, its arrangements of rocks, cairns, and spokes. He found the arrangements point to
the rising and setting places of the Sun at summer solstice, as well as the rising places of Aldebaran in Taurus, Rigel in Orion, and Sirius in Canis Major -- all bright, important stars associated
with the Solstice. Later another astronomer, Jack Robinson, found a cairn pair that marked the bright star Fomalhaut's rising point with the Sun 28 days before solstice.3
A given site may have been abandoned by its original creators, then used by others for their own purposes. In many cases, these sites are regarded as places of power.
No one knows the true origin or purpose of the [Bighorn] Medicine Wheel. Prospectors discovered the Medicine Wheel around 1885, however carbon-14 dating done on a piece of wood used in the construction
of one of the cairns dates back to 1760. Today, scientists and archeologists believe that the Medicine Wheel was created between A.D. 1200 and 1700 by Native Americans.
There are many theories that explain the intended purpose of the Medicine Wheel. Some archeologists believe that the 28 spokes represent the 28 days in a month, and two of the 6 cairns
mark the horizons of sunrise and sunset, while the remaining four mark the rising of the three brightest stars. Other archeologists claim that the Native Americans who built the Medicine
Wheel had no use for an organized calendar because they were not farmers. These archeologists believe instead that the Medicine Wheel carried religious significance and was used in
religious ceremonies. Still other archeologists believe that the Medicine Wheel was a place for powerful events to take place and that people visited the sacred site to gain strength and power.
Whatever the Medicine Wheel was originally built for, it has been used as a place of prayer for many Native Americans. Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce tribe was known to fast at the Wheel,
while Chief Washakie of the Shoshone tribe claimed to have obtained his medicine there.4
Regarding the origin and ubiquity of the Medicine Wheel among the Five Nations (Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca) of the Iroquois Confederacy, consider the following summary:
Tribes were obsessed with wiping out their "enemies." Then a dramatic shift in perception occurred, and a peace was realized, which lasted for a period of 150 to 200 years. This long truce was
the result of a great Iroquois chief, (sounds like Agonawila), later to become Hiawatha, who urged the tribes to cease the madness of brother killing brother, and formed an alliance, which came
to be known as the Confederation of Nations. The Confederation recognized that Indian peoples were more alike than different. Even though they spoke different dialects, they had the same basic
belief systems and followed similar traditions.
An important part of this transformation was the medicine wheel, which was placed in front of every tepee, and decorated in special symbols, colors, and stones, to let people entering the tribe
know about its inhabitants. The wheel was a reflection of an individual's strengths and weaknesses, and it gave people guidelines to follow for personal growth. It told people what they needed
to learn and what they needed to teach. Everyone was ordered to work on themselves, or else leave the tribe. After several generations of this work, people lost the concept of blame and anger.
This, in turn, resulted in the longest peace in modern history.8
As Jacqueline Ottmann (2005) writes:
Most First Nations people believe that all of creation, seen and unseen, is interconnected. Essentially, all things are seen as related, and there is a personal
connection and relationship to all things. Because things are connected and interconnected there is significance to everything large and small. Chief Seattle (as
cited in Jeffers, 1991) said, "This we know: All things are connected like the blood that unites us. We did not weave the web of life, we are merely a strand in it.
Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves" (p. 20). Consequently, harmony is continually sought and all of creation is valued and essentially revered because of
the inextricable interconnectedness of our universe. There is a belief that even the slightest event, action, or thought may have tremendous repercussions. [...]9
With these contextual notes in mind, here's a closer look at a Medicine Wheel as a concept map.
The above illustration is my adaptation of the Ojibway Medicine Wheel presented by The Rouge Valley Foundation (1997).
Additional descriptors have been added from several of the following sources:
First Nations Legacy on the Rouge, Rouge Valley Foundation, Program Committee and students of Joseph Howe Senior Public School in Scarborough Ontario. (1997)
A Medicine Wheel is made of stones. There were about 20,000 medicine wheels in North America, before the Europeans came. Medicine wheels are places for energy and healing,
teaching and understanding. They are used for times of reflecting on life, and for joyous celebrations.
The Medicine Wheel represents all of creation. all races of people, animals, birds, fish, insects, trees, and stones, the sun, moon and earth are in the circle of the medicine wheel.
Each stone tells part of the story. The circle is all of the cycles of nature, day and night, seasons, moons, life cycles, and orbits of the moon and planets.
The Medicine Wheel is a Native American legend in which a circle contains countless points each of which represents a different, yet valid, perspective on the nature of reality. According
to the Medicine Wheel legend, the north offers the gift of wisdom, the east offers illumination, the south offers innocence, and the west offers introspection. In the Medicine Wheel legend,
the various learning styles and types of intelligence are valued equally. The Medicine Wheel metaphor suggests several possibilities for linking individual learning styles, modifying teaching
and training practices, and creating different ways of interpreting adult learning. [...]
Semantic mapping is a strategy for graphically representing concepts. Semantic maps portray the schematic relations that compose a concept. It assumes that there
are multiple relations between a concept and the knowledge that is associated with the concept. Thus, for any concept there are at least these three types of associations:
associations of class -- the order of things the concept falls into;
associations of property -- the attributes that define the concept; and
associations of example -- exemplars of the concept.
Semantic maps are graphic representations that show how key words or concepts are related to one another. In considering the Medicine Wheel above, for example,
we dealt with a set of concepts in a sociocultural, psychospiritual model of the world. Unless the reader were already familiar with the worldview so described, the
semantic value of the map may not have been immediately apparent. Explanatory text preceded and references followed the core illustration to provide a contextual framework that might
engage semantic memory and analysis. The Medicine Wheel concept map becomes a semantic map when it means something in personal experience when we can process the information
in a meaningful way.
The information-processing model at left (Leder, et al. 2004) has application with respect to semantic mapping; it shows the neurocognitive mechanisms of information flow from one component process to the next
in the mental representation of a work of art:
Semantic processing involves several different mechanisms as the brain integrates information in response to a work of art, or to a semantic map. Semantic activation may be
diffuse or direct, engage a range of neuropsychological and psychodynamic processes, perceptual, memory, and cognitive functions, conscious and unconscious emotional responses, etc.
Ideally, such processing results in new associations, inferences, intuitions and insight.
1. Skov M. Neuroaesthetic Problems: A Framework for Neuroaesthetic Research.
In Skov M, Vartanian O., Eds. Neuroaesthetics, Baywood: Amityville, NY (2009:9-26)
Examples of semantic maps... Click an image to enlarge and visit source.
Semantic graph of French Intellectual Property Rights.
Work-in-progress maps showing linked terms of vocabulary used on the Web to talk about intellectual property rights in French. Produced for economist Yann Moulier-Boutang, UTC. Many more examples onsite. Gephi.org (2008)
Image Credit: Randall Szott. Via Language Log (18.01.07)
IS THE NEW - LeisureArts Documents every instance of the phrase "is the new" encountered from various sources in 2005.
Visual Thesaurus is an
3D interactive tool that encourages exploration of semantic relationships in the English language. This remarkable software creates an animated
display of words and meanings, placing your word at the center of a display which connects to related words and meanings you can click on to explore further.
Built using ThinkMap, a data navigation and animation
technology developed by Plumb Design, Visual Thesaurus is available in both a Desktop Edition and an Online Edition.
Type in a word and the Visual Thesaurus will show you a map of synonyms, antonyms, and definitions.
Search for images of semantic maps...
Top 5 Semantic Search Engines
A semantics search engine attempts to make sense of search results based on context. It automatically identifies the concepts structuring
the texts. For instance, if you search for "election" a semantic search engine might retrieve documents containing the words "vote", "campaigning"
and "ballot", even if the word "election" is not found in the source document.
An important part of this process is disambiguation, both of the queries and of the content on the web. What this means is that the search engine — through natural language
processing — will know whether you are looking for a car or a big cat when you search for "jaguar". [...]
Semantic mapping is an important concept in the evolution of the Web. Brainchild of Tim Berners-Lee, the Semantic Web is a vision of the Web in which "information
is given well-defined meaning, better enabling computers and people to work in cooperation".
The idea involves defining and linking data on the Web in such a way that it is also machine-readable, based on RDF and as yet undefined standards that will allow data to be utilized for automation, integration and
data reuse across various applications, rather than simply displayed.
The Semantic Web is the extension of the World Wide Web that enables people to share content beyond the boundaries of applications and websites. It has been
described in rather different ways: as a utopic vision, as a web of data, or merely as a natural paradigm shift in our daily use of the Web. Most of all, the
Semantic Web has inspired and engaged many people to create innovative semantic technologies and applications.
semanticweb.org is the common platform for this community.
Visual Think Map provides many examples of visual schemata that quickly and effectively
convey detailed information through inspiring graphics. Among the collection are maps, diagrams, info graphics, mindmaps,
brainstorms, sketchbooks, notebooks, flowcharts, and more. In the founder's words, "they are very good resources of inspiration
for various design jobs as they solve communica- tion problems using easy to understand graphics [...] basically great graphics
that look great (form) and communicate detailed info quickly and easily (function)." To browse the collection, click Photos.
The image at right, for example, is San Francisco designer Andy Proehl's Mississippi River Type Map, from his "Typography of Place" series, a word map of the cities and towns along the Mississippi River.
Below (click to enlarge), Mapping the Human 'Diseasome', by Marc Vidal, Albert-Laszlo Barabasi, and Michael Cusick, links different diseases to the genes they have in common. For a full-sized interactive version, see here.
Wayfinding in the real world is based on a mental map or mental representation of geometric features
such as directions and distances between places. Decision-making is contingent upon one's epistemology of the world,
so it also involves semantic relations between concepts with varying reliance on geometric features. Perspectives vary,
influenced by a range of factors peculiar to the individual.
Our physical maps of the world almost always place North at top, but this is a matter of convention and is by no means the only way
to represent the reality. Indeed, it may create a cognitive dissonance. If I'm living in Australia, shouldn't the top of the
world be South? Though I grew up on a farm some eight miles north of a small town, I "knew" the farm was situated to the south. To this day, more than 40 years since I left, the old homestead still seems south in
my mind's eye. That's just "where it is", in my mental map.
During the past 500 years, the majority of map publishers were located in Europe
and North America. By publishing North-oriented maps, they emphasized the geography of their own two continents,
placing the others on the periphery. Such a secondary cartographic position also suggests that these continents
were not as important economically or culturally. [...] http://maps.bpl.org/id/M8754/
The implications of any projection are enormous. Images we see shape our perceptions of the world.
It's enriching to see a variety of points-of-view. Have you ever seen a map with Australia on top? The Upside-Down world map comes
in a variety of projections, but reverses the poles. Whoever said that North must be "up"? Maps are based on a variety of assumptions,
most of which are subliminal and below our threshold of consciousness. [...] DIVERSOPHY.COM
The direction of travel required to reach the intended destination is called the bearing. Since the real world presents
numerous obstacles, one must adjust his or her heading accordingly. Upon moving forward, the bearing
will change so that it always points at the destination, thereby giving clues as to which way one should turn. When you are traveling, it can be easier to figure out where your
next turn is, and whether to turn left or right, when the direction of travel is always up. [...]
Some people always know which way is north and how to get out of a building. Others can live in an apartment for years without knowing which side faces the street. Differences among people that include spatial
skills, experience, and preferred strategies for wayfinding are part of what determines whether people get lost in buildings — and psychological scientists could help architects understand where and why people
might get lost in their buildings, according to the authors of an article published in Current Directions in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
When you enter a new building, you build a cognitive map — a representation in your mind of the objects and locations in that environment. Success in navigating in the building may depend upon what information
you put into the cognitive map. "For example, imagine visiting a new doctor's office. You walk in the front door and find your way to the office, storing information about your route and the objects you
encounter in your cognitive map. What is most interesting is how this information is then used to direct you back to the front door after the office visit.
Laura Carlson, University of Notre Dame
"If you paid attention to the sequence of turns along the path, then you may have difficulty because you need to remember to reverse the sequence, and this becomes increasingly difficult as the number
of turns increases. But instead, if you paid more attention to the objects that you passed, then you may navigate back to the front door by going from one familiar object to another without considering
the sequence of turns. This strategy will work, as long as you can always see a familiar object. If you get lost and enter an unexplored part of the building, you will have difficulty finding your way
back," says Laura A. Carlson of the University of Notre Dame, first author of the article.
In some buildings, the strategies people use and the quality of their cognitive map may not matter very much. "If the building has an obvious structure, with long lines of sight, you won't have to rely
much on this internal representation of your path," says Carlson.
Some buildings, on the other hand, make it difficult. [...]
Getting Lost in Buildings.
Carlson LA, Holscher C, Shipley TF, Dalton RC. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2010;19(5):284
Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior
I have worked extensively with cognitive maps for purposes of introspective study. The figures below are maps of intrapsychic space in a plural personality,
one characterized by multiple principals or subpersonalities, each presenting with an associated archetype. Please note that the arcs between nodes do not have descriptors. Relationships are
multiplex in schemata of this sort; those relationships indicated in the map serve to generate deep-level insight that is better served in the absence of precise definition. These are "fuzzy"
maps, in that sense, allowing greater freedom for interpretive association.
Map #1 is a representation of nine intrapsychic principals in relation to the "I" (egoic center) in the Gestalt of personality. The numbered nodes are
colored as I apprehend each particular node. Numbers are also correlated with the Enneagram personality types or life scripts.
Map #2 is a representation of cognitive functions in this Gestalt.
Map #3 is a representation of Map #2 as an intrapsychically visualized two-dimensional plane, a coronal section. I can "see" the map, and when I "inhabit" the center,
as "I" look to the nine principals, each is apprehended as a fuzzy three-dimensional sphere. Each sphere has awareness, a unique identity, and "I" communicate with each in different ways, verbal and non-verbal.
Image Credit: Head outline adapted from the original presented by Martin Simunek, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Czech Technical University, Prague. See
Visualization of talking human head, Figure 4.
Map #4 represents the Gestalt of all nine principals and the "I" (central sphere), acting in unity through the relational self
These maps represent an inner landscape of continuously evolving factors. The representations are static, but the factors so portrayed are not.
In Art at the Event Horizon (2006), new media artist
Avi Rosen1,2,3 uses
my second map (Map #2) to illustrate human cognition as a black hole. Translated from the original Hebrew by
Sonia Dantziger, Rosen writes:
It is possible to compare areas of the brain to micro-black holes, or centres in cyberspace where Bose-Einstein processes take place. The wrapping of the body,
including the senses, serves as an event horizon, and the singularity as the soul or consciousness. The topology of consciousness resembles a torus, allowing
circular movement from place to place in consciousness, and also making jumps in space-time, similar to networks in cyberspace and black holes in space.
The associative cortex role is to establish new nets, and omni connection of neurons in the brain. This act is similar to the Internet build-up. "The brain has no
knowledge in it, until the neuron interconnection is built. Our identity is based on how our neurons are interconnected" (Restak, 2001h 26). [...]
Figure 1. Einstein-Rosen bridge, from: Kaku 1994, 253. Avi Rosen, Art at the Event Horizon (2006).
This article compares real space, mental space, and virtual electronic space that connect
them. The claim is that the three topological spaces are similar to a torus. Concentrations of mass in
each of the three spaces create areas that bend distance and time, like the phenomenon of a black
hole. Cyberspace is the electronic unifier of the three spaces, and enlarges the event horizon (the
boundary of the black hole) of human consciousness. The topology falling within the boundaries of
the event horizon is a non-Euclidean geometric distortion in the style of Riemann, and Einstein's
general theory of relativity. A new examination of these phenomena using technical tools, leads to a
different view of concepts, mainly post-modernistic, such as: simulacra, schizophrenia, hyper-reality,
hyper-space, hyper-spectral sound and image, that today dominate the real world view, and the
definition of cyberspace and human consciousness, and art. Cyberspace is the extension of the
human brain that creates integrated consciousness.
Cognitive maps enable interpretational multiplexing. While quite beyond the highly internalized objective of my original map, which was intended as an exploration of personal
identity in a gestalt of inner voices, Rosen's work stimulated new questions and insights. Looking from without, looking from within, looking to a destination...
A more detailed map.
The next two maps deal with archetypal influences, drives, functions, and typologic descriptors. Though it seems rather skeletal, at this writing, the first
map proved very useful to me when it was created several years ago. The second map, a recent revision which supersedes a similar map created at the same time as the first, provides
me with a basic framework to reassess certain eclectic constructs and operational predicates.
A variation, exploring additional factors. Image representing the relational self is derived from an image of the Cat's Eye nebula taken by the Hubble Space Telescope
Advanced Camera for Surveys instrument. Credit: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
Intraspec.ca : Cura Proba Spectra Specifica Readings, writings and research on matters of health and well-being.
A not-for-profit site (2002-2013) by Richard Dagan, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. All site content, except where otherwise noted, is provided under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Exceptions, where copyright resides with the original author or current holder thereof, include all excerpted text and third-party images provided herein. All such material is presented in accord with
fair dealing and
fair use, fully cited, and hyperlinked to source whenever possible. Logos and trademarks are the property of
their respective owners.
Reference material presented on this site is carefully researched and assessed, fully cited and date-stamped, particularly on pages providing information in the public interest. Medical content
is presented solely for purposes of education, and is not intended to substitute for informed medical advice or care it is strongly recommended that you consult your physician with any questions or concerns
you might have regarding your condition. The same applies in the context of all other content on this site. The compiled materials, analyses, and findings are my own, intended to
facilitate expeditious access to relevant in-depth information. In your search for answers, it is important that you perform your own due diligence.